The Case Of Jennifer And Jianshe Li - 952 Words

Case Study Journal Two The case of Jennifer and Jianshe Li would be extremely challenging and difficult for any counselor/therapist to handle and guide the couple through; furthermore, the goal would be to guide the couple thorough the difficult decisions they have to make regarding Jennifer’s prognosis and pregnancy. As a helper, there would be many issues involved; in addition, there would be some extremely sensitive material the worker would have to deal with. My main purpose would be to guide them through the process. First of all. Jennifer has been diagnosed with a progressive disorder of the on the central nervous system, which is linked to genetics. I would recommend they ask the specialist how the pregnancy could affect Jennifer. Would the pregnancy be detrimental to her health? I would suggest getting a second and a third opinion. Would the fetus survive if it was afflicted with the disease? These are questions that only a specialist in neurology would be able to answer. I would help them l ook for a specialist who is familiar with the disease; consequently, it would be beneficial to find an expert who has dealt with it before. I would help the couple research the disease, then they can take it from there. There are two routes for this couple; therefore, they can select to have their child and try to minimize the risks. It was their dream to have a child, and I can empathize due I love my children. If the specialist came to the conclusion that the pregnancy might

What Is Cool Interpreting the Idea in The Cool Kids by...

When defining the term â€Å"cool,† what factors do you take into consideration in order to describe what â€Å"cool† is? Do you think of â€Å"cool† regarding popular culture or the type of â€Å"cool† that someone has as a type of characteristic. In her article The Cool Kids, Katy Waldman, assistant editor of Slate.com, addresses the variations of cool and how it is something that differs between people. In this essay, I will be discussing how Waldman addresses her audience with relatable examples in order to show the differences between what is considered â€Å"cool† as well as the many interpretations of it. In The Cool Kids, Waldman shares common interests with her audience concerning the ideas of cool. The audience that Waldman addresses is adults around there 20’s and is interested in popular culture. Waldman first begins her article with her own experience of what was considered cool throughout middle school. She utilizes examples of different television series that were once considered cool, as well as different fashion trends that only cool kids wore throughout those years. Through her own experience, Waldman is able to draw a connection to her audience as her audience has most likely experienced scenarios that were similar. Since her audience is people who are concerned about the current events regarding popular culture, it is guaranteed that they have all gone through the struggle of trying to keep up with popular culture, whether it is trying to keep up with the latest television

SCEG Relevant and Non-Relevant Costs Free Essays

South Carolina Electric and Gas (SCEG), a principal subsidiary of SCANA Corporation, makes life convenient by bringing electricity and natural gas to homes and businesses. The company also provides residential, commercial, and industrial builder service firms the energy they need for construction (www.sceg. We will write a custom essay sample on SCEG: Relevant and Non-Relevant Costs or any similar topic only for you Order Now com). The company also has telecommunications services and other businesses which involve non-regulated energy. To supply electricity and natural gas, SCEG operates 22 various plants, most of which are coal plants. Today, SCEG serves nearly 1 million customers in South Carolina (â€Å"SCEG Quick Facts†). The coal plants of SCEG emit nitrogen oxide. Also known as NOx, this is one of the compounds that form smog in the atmosphere. Thus, the company has been making efforts to lower the emission of NOx. Just recently, SCEG has installed the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipment on Wateree Station and Williams Station, the two largest plants of the company to reduce NOx emission. This has cost them $138 million (www.sceg.com). The company has also invested 80 million dollars on equipment for emission and pollution control (Zaleski, 2007). In 2008, the firm has decided to install the SCR equipment on the Cope Station as well. The project, which started on the summer of 2007 and will end on the fall of 2008, will cost the company 69 million dollars (Zaleski, 2007). This amount includes relevant costs (i.e., costs that are significant to a specific decision) such as the cost of the equipment and the cost of installation (CITATION). The previously mentioned expenditures prior to the Cope Station project–the investment on SCR equipment and on the emission and pollution control equipment—are considered sunk costs. Whether SCEG would push through with the Cope project or not, the costs of these equipments have already been incurred. Hence, they are irrelevant to the project. SCEG reported in its statement of projected expenditure that the budget for the Cope Station project was $ 26 million (â€Å"SCANA Corp. 2007-2009 Projection Expenditure,† 2007). Since the investment would cost $ 69 million, it would result in a budget deficit of $ 43 million. This implies that the company had to make budget adjustments in order to fund the said project. When the project is complete, it would surely result in â€Å"clean, safe, and reliable power source for [the] citizens and industries† (Zaleski, 2007). Although it would not bring the company explicit financial benefits, by making the plant environment-friendly, the project can further contribute to the healthy relationship of SCEG with its neighboring communities. Moreover, this may â€Å"attract new industries [to invest] in [the] area† as the environment becomes free of the polluting NOx (Zaleski, 2007). Reference About SEG.. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2008 from http://www.sceg.com/en/about-sceg/ Builder services. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2008 from http://www.sceg.com/en/builder services Nitrogen oxides. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2008 from http://www.sceg.com/en/my-community/environment/air/nitrogen-oxides/ Residential services. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2008 from http://www.sceg.com/en/residential-services/ SCANA Corporation 2007-2009 projections for capital expenditures and cash flows. (9 February 2007). Retrieved January 26, 2008 from http://www.secinfo.com/dN11u.u3.c.htm SCEG quickfacts. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2008 Zaleski, G.. (6 November 2007). SCEG investing $69 million in Cope plan to reduce emissions. The Times and Democrat. Retrieved January 26, 2008 from http://www.thetandd.com/articles/2007/11/06/news/12812156.txt How to cite SCEG: Relevant and Non-Relevant Costs, Essay examples